Angelica Raggi vs Laura Boehner Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Sep at 01:36 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Raggi vs L. Boehner

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Raggi 1 - 0 Boehner
They have played 2 sets in total, with Angelica Raggi winning 2 and Laura Boehner winning 0. The last match between Angelica Raggi and Laura Boehner was at the W15 Viserba, 12-09-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Angelica Raggi getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Raggi | 1 |
Boehner | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Viserba(09-12-25)
A. Raggi vs L. Boehner H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
56.65% (213-163) | Career Total W/L | 40.55% (103-151) |
1 | Clay | 0 |
6 | Titles | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Raggi vs L. Boehner Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Raggi outperforms Boehner with 37.98% success compared to 35.01%. Is this a significant advantage? It may indicate a slight edge for Raggi.
- Return Game Stats: Raggi has a higher success rate at returning on both first and second serves, with 49.84% on second serves and 36.28% on first serves compared to Boehner's 48.01% and 34.52% respectively.
- Pressure Handling: Raggi saves 48.41% of breakpoints, a better rate than Boehner's 43.87%, suggesting a better ability to handle pressure situations.
- Overall Performance: In the past year, Raggi has won 57.69% of matches, outperforming Boehner who has won 50% of their matches.
- Surface Preference: Raggi excels on Hard surfaces with a 64% win rate, whereas Boehner's best is on Clay with 43%. Who has an advantage on the current surface? It depends on where the match is held.
- Event Level and Opponent Quality: Raggi has faced slightly tougher competition, with opponents averaging a ranking of 366.54 compared to Boehner's 374.38.
- Deciding Sets: Boehner has an advantage in deciding sets, winning 57% of them versus Raggi's 44%.
- Break Point Conversion: Both players have similar break point conversion rates, with Boehner at 42.86% slightly edging Raggi's 42.21%.
Editorial Prediction (September 12, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance, Raggi demonstrates slightly better form in key statistical areas including second serve performance and return game effectiveness. These factors are notably influential in determining match winners. Additionally, Raggi's ability to handle pressure and win a higher percentage of matches over the past year suggests a competence level that could translate into success in this matchup.
On the other hand, Boehner's proficiency in deciding sets and similar capability in converting break points provides them with opportunities to challenge Raggi throughout the match. Nonetheless, given the performance patterns highlighted, Raggi seems slightly better equipped to capitalize on these critical phases of the game.
Taking into account Raggi's strengths in returning and breakpoint defense, along with Boehner's inability to match up on hard courts, Raggi is the slight favorite for this upcoming tennis match.
Angelica Raggi vs Laura Boehner Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Raggi vs L. Boehner H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 3 |
0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
1:54:38 | Average Match Time | 1:54:38 |
63% (35/56) | 1st Serve % | 56% (36/64) |
69% (24/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (18/36) |
48% (10/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (10/28) |
55% (6/11) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
56% (36/64) | Return Points Win % | 39% (22/56) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Raggi Recent Matches Played
L. Boehner Recent Matches Played

A. Raggi vs L. Boehner Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
56.65% (213/163) | YTD Win/Loss | 40.55% (103/151) |
55.09% (476/388) | Sets Win/Loss | 41.89% (230/319) |
52.76% (4200/3761) | Games Win/Loss | 46.54% (2278/2617) |
64.05% (98/55) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.82% (20/29) |
51.98% (105/97) | Clay Win/Loss | 42.13% (83/114) |
47.62% (10/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/8) |
0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
436 | Aces Total | 84 |
0.35 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
1349 | Total Double Faults | 235 |
1:19:50 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
468.75 | Average Opponent Rank | 319.92 |
59% (11699/19849) | 1st Serve % | 67% (4399/6554) |
61% (7097/11699) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (2360/4399) |
44% (3581/8148) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (895/2155) |
48% (1262/2626) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (325/716) |
47% (9306/19736) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2750/6563) |
0.00% (0/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
46.62% (62/71) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (27/54) |
62.66% (151/90) | Futures W/L | 43.93% (76/97) |
56% (210/373) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 41% (102/250) |
100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
45% (37/83) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (14/33) |
54% (59/109) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (20/45) |
86% (203/175) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (112/95) |
14% (203/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (112/17) |
22% (173/38) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (142/8) |